Tevans2-cropped-sBy: Tracy M. Evans, Esq., Associate, Saxon Gilmore & Carraway, P.A.

In what appears to be an effort to crack down on the misclassification of employees as independent contractors, the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued Administrator’s Interpretation No. 2015-1 providing guidance on determining whether a worker is an independent contractor. This is the first time the DOL has codified its stance on this particular subject in an Administrator’s Interpretation.

Administrator’s Interpretation No. 2015-1 adopts the six-factor economic realities test as the governing test used to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor. This test has been utilized by the federal courts in the past, and we previously reported on an Eleventh Circuit case where this test was used. The six factors are as follows:

1. The nature and degree of the employer’s control as to the manner in which the work is to be performed;
2. The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill;
3. The relative investments in facilities and equipment by the worker and the employer;
4. Whether the service rendered requires special skill;
5. The degree or permanency and duration of the working relationship; and
6. The extent to which the service rendered is an integral part of the employer’s business

It is important for employers to utilize these six factors to ensure that workers classified as independent contractors are not actually employees. Misclassification can result in costly liability, so it is important to closely review any independent contractor relationships and take appropriate steps if the factors weigh against independent contract status. Even if the only option is reclassification of the worker, this option will likely be less costly than the potential liability associated with misclassification.

 

 

© 2015 Saxon Gilmore. Saxon Gilmore publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Saxon Gilmore. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact form via the link below. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Saxon Gilmore does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.