Call Us Now : (813) 314-4500
Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Linkedin
Call Us Now : (813) 314-4500
Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Linkedin

Lesinski v. South Florida Water Management District

By Tabitha S. Etlinger, Associate, Saxon, Gilmore, Carraway & Gibbons, P.A.

TSE-Cropped2-sIn January, we summarized the Eleventh Circuit decision in United States of America ex rel. Michael Lesinski v. South Florida Water Management District, No. 12-16082, 2014 WL 23737 (11th Cir. Jan. 2, 2014). The Eleventh Circuit ruled in Lesinski that South Florida Water Management District (“SFWMD”) could not be liable in a case brought by a private citizen under the Federal Claims Act (the “Act”). In reaching its decision, the Court applied the four factor test routinely used to evaluate whether a public entity is immune from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. Id. at *2. The Eleventh Circuit concluded that SFWMD would generally be considered an arm of the state pursuant to the four factor test used under the Eleventh Amendment and, therefore, could not be sued under the Act. Id. at *3-*5. Notwithstanding, the Eleventh Circuit expressly limited its holding in Lesinski to the application of the Act to SFWMD and explicitly withheld a decision as to whether SFWMD would be immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. Id. at FN 9. On April 2, 2014, Lesinski filed a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, seeking to appeal the adverse decision, but on May 19, 2014, Lesinski’s petition was denied. As a result, no further clarification is provided, at least through the Lesinski case, regarding the relationship between immunity under the Eleventh Amendment and application of the Act to public entities.

 

 

© 2014 Saxon Gilmore. Saxon Gilmore publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Saxon Gilmore. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact form via the link below. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Saxon Gilmore does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.